Part of our confidence/concern that prices can continue to rise in the chemical space in general stems from what seems to be very strong demand – again confirmed in earnings reports overnight, as well as in the rail data from today's daily report, as well as inventory data that suggest we are below recent ratios to shipment trends. The inventory piece is the great unknown here because the supply chain shocks of the last 20 months will have reset expectations around “safe” levels of inventory and it is hard to judge whether the new “comfort” normal will be back to the trend in the chart or 50% higher! If the new comfort level is materially higher than in the past, demand growth will remain strong and price momentum could continue through 2022. Our expectations for a mega-cycle in basic chemicals and polymers – targeting late 2023 and 2024 could be dragged forward because of higher apparent demand the time to buy the equities could be now, on that basis.
The recent Dow guidance is worth some further comment as it is being heralded in the stock market as an earnings miss, or at least that is what is implied in the stock performance, even though the signals around margin squeezes in 4Q have been in place for weeks and have been covered extensively in our work. Some elements of modeling chemical company earnings are complex, but rising energy (and therefore feedstock) prices is not one of them. We have commented several times over the last couple of years about the lack of almost any effort being made by the sell-side to rethink estimates mid-quarter, choosing instead to take or interpret company guidance (generally in the first month of a quarter) and then wait until earnings are reported. This does a disservice to both the institutional investors and the chemical companies, as the investors quickly conclude that estimates are likely too high – simply looking broadly at what sectors get hurt by rising energy – but generally do not have a good measure of by how much earnings will be impacted, so they sit on the sidelines, expecting the surprise. That said, there are so many algorithms working today that the alternative of gradual negative revisions to a more reasonable target for the quarter is also likely to hurt stock performance.