We noted in today's daily report the number of shutdowns that are taking place in Asia and in Europe as feedstock costs become unmanageable, and the assumption is that these units will restart when economics recover. This may not be the case as companies factor in the costs of operating smaller units in an emission-constrained world, and the decision to shut down for economic reasons today may be the final nail in the coffin for some older and generally less economic base chemical units. Many smaller facilities in China were built in the 80s and 90s and these might not come back online if there is no easy way to lower emissions, but the harder decisions will likely be in Europe.
While the Linde results were very strong and surprised to the upside, we also want to focus on what messages they send about the broader economy. As recently as 10 years ago all of the industrial gas companies' results provided a reasonable barometer on the state of the industrial and other parts of the global economy. Industrial gases are an enabling raw material or process gas for so many industries that their direct use is generally a function of operating rates for the industry that they serve. Over the last 10 years, Air Products has deviated from the traditional model, with some very large investments targeting specific projects in Asia and the Middle East and their results are a less useful measure of overall economic activity. While both Air Liquide and Linde continue to reflect the broad economic backdrop well, both could be dragged into large projects around hydrogen over the coming years, and depending on how they choose to report earnings, we could lose the tangential “information” in their reported results. For now, the Linde results are very supportive of the broader industrial-economic strength that is being reflected in earnings and guidance across many industries, including chemicals and refining. The company has added comparisons with 2019 to show how much underlying growth has happened over the two years. While inflation and interest rate increases could slow things down, the Linde numbers confirm that we have a very positive demand backdrop today, and the company’s guidance would suggest that they think it can continue.
The linked headline is interesting and accurate, but the “civilian” education around plastics has just begun – and will need to be continuing education. Plus, the agenda for plastics producers likely changed with COP26. On the first point, while consumers have been made more aware of plastic waste issues and recycling in 2021, it is still very mixed by geography, with some countries and some US states making major pushes in 2021 while others have lagged. There remains a significant level of skepticism and disinterest in recycling in the US as we discussed in a recent ESG and Climate report – linked here (See chart below). The continuing education comment is based on the likely significant evolution of plastics over the next ten years. If we introduce more biodegradable polymers into the mix, these will have to be dealt with differently by consumers. Also, as packagers move towards more “recyclable” packaging, more materials will move from a waste stream to a chemically recyclable stream and ultimately to a mechanically recyclable stream – as this evolves, consumers will need constant updates is they are expected to play a part.
The CP Chem propylene splitter announcement linked suggests that CP Chem expects surplus refinery propylene to be around for the long-term, and likely has supply lined up from the parent companies. However, this is still a bit of a gamble unless both parents see a scenario where they would change catalysts on FCC units longer-term and run at higher severity for more propylene and more hydrogen. This project looked a lot better only a few weeks ago than it does today – based on the spread in the Exhibit below, but propylene demand continues to grow faster than ethylene demand in the US and with all incremental ethylene capacity based on ethane, propylene consumers either have to choose the path from refineries or invest in on purpose PDH. PDH is an energy-intensive process with a large carbon footprint, and splitting refinery propylene likely looks far less problematic from an emissions perspective, especially if there is surplus process heat on-site. In our ESG report today we talk about polymer recycling into new end markets, but polypropylene may see more direct substitution, especially if we see consumables related polypropylene recycled into durable polypropylene markets. This might dent demand growth for polypropylene going forward, but probably not meaningfully.
We remain concerned that natural gas E&P investment in the US remains too low to meet expected demand increases, especially for natural gas-fired power stations and LNG, but also possibly for NGLs, especially ethane, given new ethylene capacity and a fresh export market in Mexico. Near-term, natural gas prices are showing some easing relative to crude, albeit a very volatile trend – Exhibit below – but we see medium and longer-term shortages unless E&P spending increases. The new power facilities shown in the bottom Exhibit will all need incremental natural gas, and the international LNG market is so tight that as new capacity comes online in the US we would expect it to run as hard as is possible. This sets up for a market where the clearing price of natural gas in the US is at risk of being set by the marginal exporter. The price jump for domestic consumers would be dramatic and it would cause all sorts of headaches in Washington and probably intervention. We showed the incremental natural gas price in the Netherlands in our Daily Report on November 18th, and if the US price were to reflect the netback from this level, they would rise close to $30 per MMBTU. The natural gas industry needs some sort of global blessing to continue to operate as what will likely be the core transition fuel. It will be necessary to clean up the emissions footprint of natural gas, but the industry should be encouraged to invest on this basis. For those who doubt whether the US natural gas price can rise to $30/MMBTU – note that the Europeans did not think $30 was possible either.
Our Sunday Thematic research a week ago (see linked report) discussed slowing growth investment in the traditional commodity chemical industry and suggested that ESG and climate pressures might slow investment even further. Yesterday, our Sunday Thematic made the argument that some of those dollars will target strategic M&A. We have recently seen an uptick in global chemicals sector M&A, and we find few items suggesting activity levels will slow in the near-to-medium term. In part, we think strategic M&A will be easier to get Board approval for than “new build” capacity additions, and it can be viewed as better use than holding cash or complementary to dividends and buybacks. Also, ESG and climate concerns could spur M&A activity, as companies look to separate bad emission assets from good ones – especially if the market values them very differently.
Our latest Sunday Thematic report, "Damned if you Dow and Damned if you Down’t. Hard to win", centers around Dow's announced development of a new net-zero carbon emissions site in Alberta, Canada. It discusses company-specific and sector ramifications for Dow's strategic move to produce low-cost low carbon polyethylene in Canada while also expanding capacity.
The move by China to reduce overall energy consumption is an effort to make progress on emissions but also to curtail energy demand where there is either a shortage or an over-dependence on coal-based power generation. The immediate impact in the acetic acid chain is clear from exhibit 1 in today's daily report.If these moves in China become more widespread they could reduce the significant near-term surpluses that the country has in polyolefins, PTA and PET. Why consume either expensive or high carbon power to make products that you currently cannot sell and that are either being sold at a loss or flowing into inventory? China has the structure to make decisions like this. Should this happen we could perhaps see a recovery in polyolefins pricing and PET pricing in China – as seen for the acetic chain in the exhibit below. Keeping production in line with the demand in China is important in the very near term as the fall out from the Evergrande collapse suggests that demand into the property market has been inflated and will likely correct negatively – increasing surpluses. China can force material into the export market, if it can find containers and if it is willing to operate at break-even margins. Better to curtail production.