Today's apparent exceptions are in sectors very focused on energy security and transition, as we noted in our most recent Sunday Thematic, and agriculture, where crop shortages are driving up prices and demand for yield-enhancing inputs. In the OCI results below, we see a company doing well, despite having impacted assets in Europe. Still, we also see some potential upside in methanol as we head into the European winter, with the possibility that methanol is used as a fuel, essentially as a carrier for methane, and a workaround for constrained LNG infrastructure. As a fuel, it is not directly substituted for methane in any application, as it is a liquid, but some energy users might be able to adapt, and a $30 per MMBTU natural gas price in Europe can cause you to be quite creative. Of course, the methanol export opportunity for the US will depend on the US natural gas price remaining well below the price in Europe. For more see today's daily report.
Chemical railcar volumes remain very strong in the US, despite some issues with exporting polymers, which has led to inventory builds on the coast, especially the Gulf Coast, and despite the implied consumer volume purchase decline in 1Q GDP estimates (sales grew but prices rose 500 basis points more than sales growth – suggesting an equivalent decline in volumes). As we noted yesterday, some companies closer to the consumer are indicating demand weakness and are more cautious about 2Q outlooks. If a higher than usual proportion of rail freight is moving into inventory, either at customers or stuck in rail cars – something Union Pacific has signaled – we could see a correction.
Methanol is one of a few chemicals that is directly impacted by the price of natural gas, and as the chart below shows, the pain in China (and in Europe) is extreme and it is unlikely that any facilities that require imported natural gas – or local gas with prices based on imports – are operating today. The volume and margin opportunities for those companies connected to low priced natural gas – the US, the Middle East, and other niche locations such as Trinidad, are as good as they have ever been and we are a little surprised that Methanex did not push a little harder with US pricing, given that export netbacks are likely surging. Urea and ammonia are in the same boat and prices are much higher, but the US is a net importer and international prices are directly impacting the US price.
A couple of weeks ago we raised the idea that US methanol could be a significant beneficiary of the conflict in Central Europe, not just because it is very economically unattractive to make methanol in Europe, but because it might be possible for Europe to import methanol for its energy value - $40 per MMBTU natural gas can make all sort of alternates look attractive. The impetus behind the methanol spot price increase in the US may be in part rising local natural gas – or the fear of further increases – but export demand is likely the larger driving factor and this could continue or even increase further if potential European importers work out how to convert to use methanol as a fuel.
More confirmation from Covestro that global demand growth is strong, supporting reports that we have seen from most companies over the last few weeks. Some have struggled with raw material cost squeezes and either late attempts to raise prices or pricing lags in contract agreements, but almost all have pointed to very strong demand outside of auto OEM. We have questioned how much of this strong demand is inflation-driven, but it is very hard to tell as the last time we had significant inflation we did not have such an interwoven global supply chain as we have today, and consequently, it is harder to assess how much pre-buying may be going on, not because of fear of higher prices but because of fear of supply. Note that we have at least two European automakers (VW and Renault) shutting down facilities this week because they cannot key parts from Ukraine. This adds to the already problematic path for parts from China as well as the semiconductor shortage. If everyone is looking for a little bit more it would explain the very high 1Q 2022 demand that all are talking about and it likely means that inflationary pressures will continue as chemical and polymer makers try to make more, against a backdrop of higher raw materials and find it easier to increase their prices because their customers are as concerned about availability as they are prices.
The CF slide below shows very clearly the US competitive edge when it comes to making anything that has a natural gas base, and while we tend to talk mostly about ethylene, ammonia, urea, other ammonia derivatives, and methanol are all seeing significant cost advantages. The Chinese coal-based costs are better than those in Europe and Asia based on natural gas but margins remain well below those in the US. The challenge with the coal-based chemistry in China is that it has substantial CO2 emissions, and the facilities were not designed for carbon capture. As China develops a carbon cap and trade market and as these facilities get included, costs will rise significantly.
Another Lesson From The Past: Costs Will Matter
High prices are spurring behavioral changes throughout the supply chain. Per our analysis, it is causing buyers to look for alternatives and ways to use less material and increasing interest in new production, often without much thought about relative cost. In Exhibit 1 (from yesterday's report), we show the methanol peak of the mid-90s. This development resulted from supply shortages rather than high costs. It encouraged multiple projects to receive serious consideration – including methanol from wood chips – where costs looked good at the time but not on a historical basis, and as the chart shows, not on a forward basis. Most ideas never got past the planning stage. With sustainability driving a significant share of the growth investment decisions, we think several “renewable” ideas could encourage investment that rely on price premiums to keep returns attractive. While this setting might look supported today, it will likely look less tenable if traditional commodity prices retreat into a commodity trough or lower-cost competitive materials emerge.
Global commodity chemicals are often a relative rather than an absolute game, especially where there is significant international trade. The global price of natural gas has risen dramatically, especially in countries or regions where the marginal BTU is coming from imported LNG – see yesterday’s daily report for a comparative chart. The US may be seeing much higher natural gas prices but other parts of the world have it much worse, and with most of its methanol capacity in regions/areas with very competitive natural gas, it is not surprising that Methanex is upbeat. The higher natural gas price in the US is giving Methanex and other US producers the ammunition to raise prices and the higher costs outside the US mean that international volumes are going to find more attractive markets in many locations versus the US. While we have seen some moves to create low carbon polymers and low carbon ammonia, this has not come to methanol yet and methanol does have one of the largest CO2 footprints, per ton of product. While Methanex is currently talking about returning surplus cash to shareholders, there may come a time – sooner rather than later – when some of that cash gets redirected to carbon abatement.
We will expand on the Olin results and some of the benefits and potential pitfalls of the revised strategy in our Sunday piece as we can draw some comparisons (some good and some bad) from other corporate examples over time. For now, it is working and few would have predicted a $50+ stock for Olin a year ago. Some market fundamentals are working in Olin’s favor, but much of the success is coming from a more radical approach to customer engagement and avoidance of customers generating minimal returns, regardless of what that means for production. So far this is a great first act from the new leadership of Scott Sutton – we will talk about what a second act may need to look like on Sunday.
The charts below show that North American methanol pricing is seeing support from higher natural gas prices as you would expect, but we are also seeing some significant price improvement in China, See more in today's daily report. If China is coal constrained, as suggested in many of the power-related stories, it may be impacting chemical production from coal at the margin. Alternatively, with LNG prices so high and imported naphtha and propane prices rising in China, the country may be using more coal at the margin to make chemicals.