We have discussed in several recent reports the very mixed fortunes in the intermediate and specialty chemical sector related to whether companies have been able to move prices fast enough to cover costs. The two large blue bars in the AkzoNobel chart below show that Akzo was close, but did not make it. We expect other examples like this over the coming weeks but we also expect some companies to have done better – some of this depends on mix and contract terms, but a lot has to do with how early you acted on the rising cost trend and how aggressive you were willing to be with customers. Dow is another example of a company struggling to get pricing high enough to cover cost increases, although Dow and others have aggressive price increase announcements in the market for polyethylene for April and May that would make a significant difference to US margins if successful.
As Avient and the linked paint article remind us, there are sectors of the US chemical industry that rely on imported products – in these cases pigments, and the supply chain challenges and logistic delays have caused production problems in the US and price increases in 2021. The automotive segment of the paint industry has seen lower demand because of the auto OEM production slowdown, and pigment shortages and price spikes would likely have been worse if automakers had been running at full rates. There is no sense of impending relief in the logistic issues as we go through 4Q earnings reports and we could continue to see issues for a while. This should be good for US-based pigment suppliers, but while Chemours, Venator, and Tronox all have capacity in the US, they also have capacity outside the US which likely faces some supply chain challenges.
The linked article looks at the chemical inflationary cycle of the 70s, which has some relevant indicators for what we are seeing today, but there were also some stark differences. Rising raw material prices is a common theme and while it is convenient to blame OPEC+ this time, the group is not nearly as much to blame today as it was in the 70s. Consumers were facing not just higher oil prices, but also genuine shortages because of the OPEC cutbacks and the multi-year lead times that it took non-OPEC producers to ramp up E&P and ultimately production. This time the oil is there and relatively easy to get to, especially in the US, but the capital spending decisions of the US oil producers – mostly because of ESG related pressure – are holding back the production.
The 2Q volume driver of Kuraray’s earnings recovery was substantial, partly because end-market demand is strong and because this more mid-stream and specialty portfolio has significant operating leverage, much more than you would see from the commodity producers. We find this as a notable downstream sector trend to keep in mind. As seen below, increased selling prices are an important driver of Kuraray full-year profit growth expectations, but the volume piece is the most critical component, in our view. As discussed in our daily report today available in LINK, we continue to see volatile but elevated basic chemical prices.
The concerns about supply chain inflation hurting chemical demand are likely very end-use specific. While the packagers and consumer goods sellers are seeing significant inflation in all raw materials, not just polymers, the packaging is a minor component of the cost and value of what they are selling and while it may hurt their earnings, it is unlikely to stifle demand – none of us is likely to stop buying milk, orange juice or cookies if the prices rise a couple of cents because the manufacturers are trying to cover some of their higher costs.