While it has been a long time coming, and it is unclear whether COVID hindered or helped, the DuPont materials exit is not a surprise and we noted after the IFF deal that we believed that Ed Breen was not done. During his time at Tyco, Mr. Breen showed a very clear ability to identify better owners for businesses that were lost in a conglomerate structure. We had always anticipated the same with DuPont and the business that is moving to Celanese is one we had expected to move and we had discussed previously. This should be a win for both companies as DuPont begins to look much more like a stable margin specialty chemical company with a portfolio that is becoming more ESG centric – see today's daily – while Celanese now has a large and comprehensive portfolio of polymers that are critical to the transport sector and should be able to drive both revenue and cost synergies if the company manages the integration well.
The ACC forecasts below leave us a little confused as the implication for specialty chemicals is that production declines in the US by an average of 2.0% per annum from 2019 to 2023. Given the demand that we are seeing for US manufacturing, as covered in our most recent Sunday Report, we would expect demand for all inputs to rise and it is unlikely that the gap would be filled by a swing in net imports. The lower demand from the Auto industry in 2020 and 2021 and broader manufacturing shutdowns in 2020 explains the 2020 and 2021 numbers to a degree, but it is not clear why there would not be a rebound as auto rates increase. We would also expect to see a stronger rebound in polymer production in 2022, assuming weather events are less impactful than in 2021, given substantial new capacity for polyethylene from ExxonMobil/SABIC, BayStar, and Shell.
US rail data for chemicals remain at the 5-year highs and have been there for almost 2 months. This is working its way into the supply chain and we are seeing weakness in US polymer prices across the board, except for PVC. US spot polymer prices are in a bit of a “no man's land” right now as they would need to drop significantly to find incremental demand offshore, given US premiums to the rest of the world. We believe that most of the volume leaving the US is doing so within company-specific businesses – ExxonMobil supplying ExxonMobil customers, Dow supplying Dow customers, etc, and consequently, these shipments do not show up in the spot market.
The linked article looks at the chemical inflationary cycle of the 70s, which has some relevant indicators for what we are seeing today, but there were also some stark differences. Rising raw material prices is a common theme and while it is convenient to blame OPEC+ this time, the group is not nearly as much to blame today as it was in the 70s. Consumers were facing not just higher oil prices, but also genuine shortages because of the OPEC cutbacks and the multi-year lead times that it took non-OPEC producers to ramp up E&P and ultimately production. This time the oil is there and relatively easy to get to, especially in the US, but the capital spending decisions of the US oil producers – mostly because of ESG related pressure – are holding back the production.
With ExxonMobil and Baystar’s ethylene plants in start-up and Shell expected to come online in Pennsylvania in 1H 2022, the news that Braskem wants to double its ethane imports from the US in 2022, adds to concern that the US may struggle to meet ethane needs at peak demand rates in 2022. We would be less concerned if we saw natural gas production rising, which is unclear for 2022, despite the expected new LNG capacity. Ethane is likely to follow any upward movement in natural gas pricing as there will be a need to bid the product away from heating alternatives. The increment suggested by Braskem in the Exhibit below is not larger in the overall scheme of US ethane demand, but every gallon may matter in 2022. See today's daily report for more.
Clearly, as a direct consequence of our shortage theme this week, ExxonMobil announces a large new complex in China is through FID. This may be the company rushing something ahead before tighter restrictions are imposed or it may be an indication that with a 2060 net-zero pledge China is going to let things slide for a while. We would not be surprised to see ExxonMobil face some bad PR around this project if there is not some emission abatement plan with it. The facility will give ExxonMobil some further integration – effectively consuming equity hydrocarbons – but, if the company is setting itself up for criticism for investing in jurisdictions with lower emissions standards, this could backfire. It is also a very counter-cyclical investment given the poor profitability seen in the region right now (chart below) and as we discussed in our Sunday Piece - Waiting For The Big One – Is A Chemical Mega-Cycle Ahead?.
Our latest Sunday Thematic report, "Damned if you Dow and Damned if you Down’t. Hard to win", centers around Dow's announced development of a new net-zero carbon emissions site in Alberta, Canada. It discusses company-specific and sector ramifications for Dow's strategic move to produce low-cost low carbon polyethylene in Canada while also expanding capacity.
It is a gas, gas, gas! Every other story this week is about natural gas shortages and pricing – whether it is natural gas in the US or LNG everywhere else. The scatter diagram below from the EIA below is very interesting as it speaks of anticipation more than anything else. Gas prices are high given the level of US inventory relative to “normal”. There is speculation that demand is going to outstrip supply over the next few months. Whether much of this will be LNG-related remains to be seen as we may not be able to run the current capacity any faster – that said, through the end of July it looked like there was spare capacity at several of the US LNG facilities and maybe the constraint is shipping. Regardless, the current US price implies shortage, whether because domestic demand overwhelms supply this winter or because LNG steps up. The original timeline of the Venture Global facility at Calcasieu Pass in Louisiana has slipped and this facility will not impact demand for the next 12 months at least, with ExxonMobil’s Golden Pass project a year later and targeting a 2024 start.
The ACC “chemical activity barometer” shown in the exhibit below is more impressive when you consider that by August of last year the demand recovery was in full swing and operating rates were high. There was some negative impact from the first hurricane, but this hit very late in August 2020 and would not have influenced the ACC reported activity significantly. We focus on price and margin in most of our commodity commentary and this is appropriate, given how much more important they are than incremental volume for all commodities, but it is worth noting that all of the chemical producers get decent cash flow gains from uninterrupted high (optimal) operating rates. The last two years have been a little plagued by more than expected unplanned stoppages, and this has helped keep the US market buoyant, but those that have been able to run at optimized rates for prolonged periods are benefiting. Prices have been the biggest contributor for Dow and ExxonMobil on the integrated polyethylene front in the US this year, but both have had the benefit of very strong operating performance, as have most others with a bias to Texas. Dow and ExxonMobil have large facilities that were in the path of Ida. LyondellBasell and CP Chem do not. See our daily report for more.
The advanced nature of the ExxonMobil/SABIC project, which we have discussed previously, is another cause for concern around US polyethylene market strength for a couple of reasons. First, it is only the first wave, with Baystar and Shell hot on the heels in 1H 2020. Second, it will add another ethylene seller in the US – SABIC – and this may be enough to cause some ripples. If you look at this in the context of the Asia production growth data provided by the ACC (below) there should be a significant cause for concern around the global balance for many products. Some of the specific Asia country growth, year on year and year to date, is driven by COVID-related shutdowns in 2020 – Taiwan and Malaysia for example – but the bulk of the China growth, which is more significant in absolute volume terms is from new capacity. China’s ability to sell surpluses internationally is hindered by the current logistic problems, but these will not last, and we should also factor in where the material will go that had been imported into China. The global polyethylene market could look very different in 2022, although all eyes will be focused on Hurricane Ida for the next week. See more in today's daily report.