China trade data for chemicals and polymers points to a dramatic swing in net imports, partly due to the new capacity added over the last 12 months. Imports are down, and exports are up. Despite the logistic challenges of moving the products and the powerful pull on consumer durables from China driven by US and European demand – much of which consume significant volumes of polymers and chemicals locally. The trade swings talk to the significant capacity additions and the relatively sluggish consumer within China, where spending patterns remain subdued because of the Pandemic. Even with a recovery in domestic spending, China has probably added 2 to 3 years of demand growth in current capacity adds – most notably for polyolefins and PET, but also for styrene, where we believe demand growth could be slowing. If logistics improve and container rates come down, the surpluses in China will have a severe negative impact on international prices. This development will likely be seen in either polymer quantities flowing faster/more freely around the globe or because the export rate of consumer durables will pick up even further at the expense of durable producers in the US and Europe.
Recent Posts
Is this the beginning of the end? The linked report that US traders are struggling to find export homes for incremental HDPE should not be a surprise given the significant price difference between the US domestic price and prices in other markets – Exhibit 1 in today's daily report. HDPE is the more fungible polyethylene, with both LLDPE and LDPE much more grade and application-specific. It is often the first polyethylene grade to spike in a shortage and fall when there is a surplus.
Before the wave on new ethylene capacity came online in the US there were several low-cost expansion projects all of which added the ability to crack ethane and some of which brought constraints around feedstock flexibility. Consequently, it is less clear than it used to be just how much US ethylene capacity can flex to exploit the very attractive light naphtha economics today. Very conservatively, we would estimate that 5-6 million tons of capacity can flex easily and about the same again with some planning and some logistic adjustments. Among the public companies, both Dow and LyondellBasell are well placed, and likely have at least 1 million tons each of flexible capacity – in both cases, there is a need for propylene and LyondellBasell has significant butadiene/C4s capacity. For context, at current prices, both companies are likely looking at an additional ethylene margin benefit in the US of $2.5-3.0 million per week for as long as this opportunity exists. This would be 0.3 cents per share per week for Dow and 0.7 cents per share per week for LyondellBasell – a rounding error in current earning but more free cash regardless. The chart below shows the unprecedented benefit in the US and see our daily report for more.
The slow decline in the oil/natural gas ratio that has persisted through the year continues – this time oil is falling faster than natural gas as both are reacting to slower demand or expectations of slower demand. We are unconvinced that the price declines will continue, but it is much less clear which direction the ratio will move. OPEC+ has far more chance of keeping cash flows high by trimming volume to balance the oil market and the overwhelming strategic logic of such a move means that it is a likely path – there is no 10-20% boost to demand to be found by lowering prices. US natural gas is still on a medium-term demand march higher in our view and more limited E&P spending should keep the market balance quite tight. There are no near-term large increments of new LNG capacity on the horizon and consequently, inventory and pricing will likely bounce around on weather changes for a while. See more in today's daily report.
The propylene charts in today's daily and below, show the extreme nature of the US market today – both relative to costs and prices internationally. Despite the very high cost of propane, the US propylene price is high enough to justify shipping propane to Asia – running it through local PDH capacity and shipping the propylene back to the US! This is the definition of unstable, but the logistics would be a constraint as the US does not have ship-based LPG import capability whee it would be needed. While we think propylene (polymer grade) is a compelling “short”, the markets over the last year have been so volatile and unpredictable and the US Hurricane season is far from over, so we would likely not put our money at risk today.
Propylene prices are rising again in the US, in part because of the propane price increase discussed in today's daily, but also because of reduced availability from other sources. These higher prices maintain upward pressure on propylene derivative pricing and we have to question how markets will adapt to much higher propylene and derivative pricing than ethylene and derivatives. There are several areas of potential overlap, where ethylene derivatives could take share from propylene derivatives and if the price deltas remain high and users become convinced that this could be the norm, it is reasonable to expect that propylene demand growth slows incrementally and ethylene demand growth benefits. In the immediate term, some quick switches could happen, but just as propylene demand marched ahead in the 1990s and 2000s because investments were made to use propylene derivatives instead of ethylene derivatives, we could begin to see investment to reverse the process. This was an incremental process for propylene over decades and we would not expect to see anything less incremental in the other direction, but ultimately this could be good for the more focused US ethylene and derivative markets if it accelerates growth in onshore demand and decreases the reliance on exports.
The chasm between US and Asia polyolefins prices remains wide, close to a 5-year high for polyethylene and setting new highs for polypropylene. The polyethylene arbitrage is not large enough to encourage US imports – first Exhibit below – largely because of the very high container rates from China.
The regional polymer price chart below shows the extreme divergence of prices between the US and Asia, and it has hit a level that has never been reached before. It is in part a function of the wave of new capacity that hit China in 2H 2020 and 1H 2021, which spurred oversupply in some chains, and the dysfunctional global trade backdrop that has kept global supply chains out of balance. As we noted earlier this week, the container costs alone to move polymers from Asia to the US are, best case, 34 cents per pound today, and this is estimate does not include the cost of moving the product to a port in China or from one in the US and also does not include a working capital charge for the time in transit. There would need to be an arbitrage of 10-15 cents a pound above this to make product movements between these regions worthwhile, assuming you can find a buyer in the US willing to experiment with imported products. The other trade impact is that US retailers and manufacturers are pulling on their US suppliers to maximize supply, pushing domestic demand for polymers above trend. The lumber price moves in the US – Exhibit 1 in today's daily report – if they spur incremental home building, it will be another boost for domestic PVC demand.
The 2Q volume driver of Kuraray’s earnings recovery was substantial, partly because end-market demand is strong and because this more mid-stream and specialty portfolio has significant operating leverage, much more than you would see from the commodity producers. We find this as a notable downstream sector trend to keep in mind. As seen below, increased selling prices are an important driver of Kuraray full-year profit growth expectations, but the volume piece is the most critical component, in our view. As discussed in our daily report today available in LINK, we continue to see volatile but elevated basic chemical prices.
To put some perspective around the shipping container costs shown in Exhibit 1 of our daily report today, $20,000 per container equates to roughly 34 cents per pound of cargo assuming that the container is filled to maximum weight. If we also add in loading inefficiencies and assume 500 miles of road transport in the US or Europe, we can add another 5-10 cents per pound. Using ethylene costs in Asia at roughly 43 cents per pound as a basic benchmark (see our most recent weekly catalyst report), we thus estimate that it would cost around 90 cents per pound to get Asia polyethylene into the US. This does not include any working capital cost assumptions around ownership of the cargo from point of production to point of use. US spot PE prices are currently below 80 cents per pound for the more commodity grades of polyethylene, which is the market that could most easily be targeted by imports from Asia. When container rates were closer to $3000 per unit, the all-in import costs would have been roughly 30 cents per pound lower and the arbitrage would have been worth exploring. Of course, if the freight rate was only $3000 per container US polymer prices would likely be lower.