With the rapid jump in international natural gas and oil prices, we would see very concerted efforts to raise basic chemicals and polymer prices in Europe and Asia and will have a positive knock-on effect for the US. In our weekly catalyst report on Monday, we showed that ethylene producers outside the US were all losing money, especially in Europe and Asia. Some European demand will already be lower, because of curtailed product exports to Russia and Ukraine, but producers will want to cover costs at a very minimum and consequently, will be trying to match price increases with cost increases and if possible do a bit better than that. All of this will create a greater margin umbrella for the US, and US exporters selling directly into international markets will see export margins step up and may see incremental opportunities to export more, assuming that the freight rates are not too onerous for incremental containers.
2022 has started very strongly for US chemical and polymer producers, in part because demand growth remains very robust based on early reads from those that have reported earnings, and in part because of the ever-increasing competitive edge that the US is enjoying over Asia – see exhibit below. US producers can maintain strong margins in the US, while easily pushing any surpluses into export markets where local suppliers cannot compete. At the same time, higher production costs and very high logistic costs make it almost impossible for those regions with capacity surpluses to move products into the US, and it is challenging also to move products into Europe. If this production and logistic cost environment persist, not only should US prices stabilize, but for select companies – those with a strong US production bias – we should see estimates for 2022 start to rise.
The Navigator Gas announcement should not be a surprise as the ethylene export arbitrage reopened in the US in September (Exhibit below) and since the terminal opened there has been a demand for ethylene exports each time the numbers have made sense. There are ethylene consumers in Asia that are net short and will buy incremental volumes from the US when the price is right relative to local suppliers and there is incremental demand in countries and regions that appear to be in surplus, including Europe, where a buyer can leverage an import to try to push local prices lower. In China, some of the facilities that require either propane or ethane imports might be better off buying ethylene versus making it today, and this is certainly the case for naphtha importers, as we highlighted in our Weekly Catalyst report on Monday. Today a US exporter can buy spot ethylene in the US and deliver it to China for less than the cost of manufacture in China, before the cost of getting the local ethylene to any consumer that is not on site.
We remain concerned that natural gas E&P investment in the US remains too low to meet expected demand increases, especially for natural gas-fired power stations and LNG, but also possibly for NGLs, especially ethane, given new ethylene capacity and a fresh export market in Mexico. Near-term, natural gas prices are showing some easing relative to crude, albeit a very volatile trend – Exhibit below – but we see medium and longer-term shortages unless E&P spending increases. The new power facilities shown in the bottom Exhibit will all need incremental natural gas, and the international LNG market is so tight that as new capacity comes online in the US we would expect it to run as hard as is possible. This sets up for a market where the clearing price of natural gas in the US is at risk of being set by the marginal exporter. The price jump for domestic consumers would be dramatic and it would cause all sorts of headaches in Washington and probably intervention. We showed the incremental natural gas price in the Netherlands in our Daily Report on November 18th, and if the US price were to reflect the netback from this level, they would rise close to $30 per MMBTU. The natural gas industry needs some sort of global blessing to continue to operate as what will likely be the core transition fuel. It will be necessary to clean up the emissions footprint of natural gas, but the industry should be encouraged to invest on this basis. For those who doubt whether the US natural gas price can rise to $30/MMBTU – note that the Europeans did not think $30 was possible either.
In the first Exhibit below we show a 5-year high in chemical rail-car movements. We have noted in research since early October that 4Q production in the US could be very high because of a combination of available capacity – following a year of weather-related delays – and very attractive margins and demand. We have been at the high end of rail car volumes for most of the quarter, and this may be part of the reason why we are seeing some price weakness for polymers in the US. Most of the polyethylene exported from the US moves from the manufacturing site to the export port via rail, so increased exports would also drive higher rail car numbers. As long as pricing and margins remain high and customer demand robust, we would expect these higher volumes to continue. This does not make us any less concerned that somewhere in the chain there is now an inventory build going on and that fortunes could reverse in 2022.
Propylene prices are rising again in the US, in part because of the propane price increase discussed in today's daily, but also because of reduced availability from other sources. These higher prices maintain upward pressure on propylene derivative pricing and we have to question how markets will adapt to much higher propylene and derivative pricing than ethylene and derivatives. There are several areas of potential overlap, where ethylene derivatives could take share from propylene derivatives and if the price deltas remain high and users become convinced that this could be the norm, it is reasonable to expect that propylene demand growth slows incrementally and ethylene demand growth benefits. In the immediate term, some quick switches could happen, but just as propylene demand marched ahead in the 1990s and 2000s because investments were made to use propylene derivatives instead of ethylene derivatives, we could begin to see investment to reverse the process. This was an incremental process for propylene over decades and we would not expect to see anything less incremental in the other direction, but ultimately this could be good for the more focused US ethylene and derivative markets if it accelerates growth in onshore demand and decreases the reliance on exports.