Our latest Sunday Thematic report, "Damned if you Dow and Damned if you Down’t. Hard to win", centers around Dow's announced development of a new net-zero carbon emissions site in Alberta, Canada. It discusses company-specific and sector ramifications for Dow's strategic move to produce low-cost low carbon polyethylene in Canada while also expanding capacity.
The US petrochemical production cost competitive advantage reflects a sharp decline at the feedstock level. Natural gas and natural gas liquids prices have risen faster than crude oil and Ex-US naphtha values since mid-1H21. In yesterday's report we identified the disconnect between propane and ethane pricing in the US. While both are high, propane is so high that it is now unprofitable to make ethylene from propane instead of just less profitable. The direction of the lines in the exhibit below shows the changing landscape clearly, and the only reason why the US chemical industry is so much more profitable than the markets in Asia is that chemical product prices are so robust, in part because of the high cost of freight between the regions.
US polyethylene producers are pushing for September price increases and their arguments center around lost production, because of Ida and Nicholas, and rising costs because of the much firmer natural gas and ethane markets. Working against them are the very high margins and what appears to be a stubborn spot market, both covered in the charts below. A contract increase in September would maintain an unprecedented gap between US contract and spot pricing, and while it is likely that the spot market is very thin, it is a very strong push back against producers for a contract hike.
Before the wave on new ethylene capacity came online in the US there were several low-cost expansion projects all of which added the ability to crack ethane and some of which brought constraints around feedstock flexibility. Consequently, it is less clear than it used to be just how much US ethylene capacity can flex to exploit the very attractive light naphtha economics today. Very conservatively, we would estimate that 5-6 million tons of capacity can flex easily and about the same again with some planning and some logistic adjustments. Among the public companies, both Dow and LyondellBasell are well placed, and likely have at least 1 million tons each of flexible capacity – in both cases, there is a need for propylene and LyondellBasell has significant butadiene/C4s capacity. For context, at current prices, both companies are likely looking at an additional ethylene margin benefit in the US of $2.5-3.0 million per week for as long as this opportunity exists. This would be 0.3 cents per share per week for Dow and 0.7 cents per share per week for LyondellBasell – a rounding error in current earning but more free cash regardless. The chart below shows the unprecedented benefit in the US and see our daily report for more.
The chart below focus on the ethylene cost curve and show that the US currently retains a distinct cost advantage despite escalating domestic feedstock costs. The current cost advantage in the US is sufficient to move ethylene derivatives into most markets profitably and while US spot prices for ethylene may not quite reflect the levels needed to stimulate exports today – US ethylene costs certainly do. The restart of the Nova unit in Louisiana may put some further downward on US ethylene prices but as we discussed yesterday, given the weather risks in 3Q it is an interesting dilemma today over whether you sell surplus ethylene or store it on the basis that spot prices will rise because of production outages – this time last year the “store it” decision would have been the right one as spot prices rose through 3Q.
The relative strength in US propane versus ethane is something we have talked about before, with the strong export pull on propane, pushing prices higher, despite equally strong demand for ethane in US ethylene units and for export. The projects to consume propane coming online in the next 12 months overwhelm the projects to consume ethane in our estimate and consequently, we believe that the delta (in chart below) will remain high and may widen further. On a cost basis, this could put US propylene and a distinct disadvantage to US ethylene and at the margin might help ethylene derivative demand relative to propylene derivative demand – most likely in paint additives, but also in some polymers where polypropylene can be substituted with other materials – it may provide a bit of a lifeline for polystyrene if the polystyrene recycling initiatives gain traction. See our daily report for more.