The Lanxess guidance below is likely the right way to go for now. The medium-term effects of the Russia/Ukraine crisis are unknowable today and all companies can monitor is the immediate impact on their businesses. Most had entered 2022 seeing very strong demand growth and the promise of a much better year as COVID restrictions were lifted and economic activity picked up generally. Now all bets are off, as it is not just the primary impacts that matter – such as a companies’ direct exposure to Russia or Ukraine – note McDonald's is suggesting that pulling out of Russia will cost the company $50 million a month, for example – but also the secondary impacts of what the conflict is doing for supply-chains and pricing. Higher hydrocarbon pricing in Europe, for example, will impact the economics of all production, not just the products sold to Russia or Ukraine. There will also be some demand adjustments directly related to the conflict – disaster relief for example – more PPE – more spending on defense and defense-related materials – DuPont’s kevlar business should be seeing a benefit for example.
The CF slide below shows very clearly the US competitive edge when it comes to making anything that has a natural gas base, and while we tend to talk mostly about ethylene, ammonia, urea, other ammonia derivatives, and methanol are all seeing significant cost advantages. The Chinese coal-based costs are better than those in Europe and Asia based on natural gas but margins remain well below those in the US. The challenge with the coal-based chemistry in China is that it has substantial CO2 emissions, and the facilities were not designed for carbon capture. As China develops a carbon cap and trade market and as these facilities get included, costs will rise significantly.
Ethylene producers in Asia are cutting back production because of the negative margins that some are seeing for much of their production. This will initially lead to higher losses as lower rates will impact plant efficiencies and raise unit costs. Cutting operating rates only works if prices rise as a consequence and if other producers choose not to cut back and seek to gain share, things get worse before they get better. The margins we show in the exhibit below are exceptionally low for Asia and are certainly at levels that would have caused many shutdowns in the past, but there are so many new players in Asia, especially in China that it may either take time or government intervention to get enough of a cutback to move prices. But if ethylene prices do improve in the region the arbitrage for moving ethylene in from the US goes up, so the US may gain more than the local producers. Also, as prices rise, someone in the region could look at marginal economics and start increasing rates. See more in today's daily report.
The theme of our Sunday report (to be found here) will be inflation this week and the signs that we are seeing across multiple industries which suggest it could be more problematic and worsen in 2022. One of the focuses is energy and how the pressures to be seen as good citizens is lowering investment in oil and natural gas production, while the world is not far enough advanced on energy transition to be able to substitute for the missing hydrocarbons. We would agree with many of the recent comments from some segments of congress, which is that the answer is not to curtail exports of LNG and crude, as by doing so we will starve the rest of the world of hydrocarbons and create worse shortages than Europe and China are seeing today. The better solution would be to support “clean” US production of the lowest emission fuels possible – especially for natural gas. As we have noted in prior research, with a global solutions hat on, the relatively low costs of natural gas F&D costs in the US, when combined with what we expect to be relatively low costs of emission abatement in the US, should drive more investment in the US, creating jobs and export income.
With ExxonMobil and Baystar’s ethylene plants in start-up and Shell expected to come online in Pennsylvania in 1H 2022, the news that Braskem wants to double its ethane imports from the US in 2022, adds to concern that the US may struggle to meet ethane needs at peak demand rates in 2022. We would be less concerned if we saw natural gas production rising, which is unclear for 2022, despite the expected new LNG capacity. Ethane is likely to follow any upward movement in natural gas pricing as there will be a need to bid the product away from heating alternatives. The increment suggested by Braskem in the Exhibit below is not larger in the overall scheme of US ethane demand, but every gallon may matter in 2022. See today's daily report for more.
Clearly, as a direct consequence of our shortage theme this week, ExxonMobil announces a large new complex in China is through FID. This may be the company rushing something ahead before tighter restrictions are imposed or it may be an indication that with a 2060 net-zero pledge China is going to let things slide for a while. We would not be surprised to see ExxonMobil face some bad PR around this project if there is not some emission abatement plan with it. The facility will give ExxonMobil some further integration – effectively consuming equity hydrocarbons – but, if the company is setting itself up for criticism for investing in jurisdictions with lower emissions standards, this could backfire. It is also a very counter-cyclical investment given the poor profitability seen in the region right now (chart below) and as we discussed in our Sunday Piece - Waiting For The Big One – Is A Chemical Mega-Cycle Ahead?.
The ExxonMobil board headline linked has come up a couple of times since the Engine No.1 victory at the board meeting. There is no doubt that capital spending plans will be reviewed with the changes at the top, and we expect more management changes, which could also drive spending priorities. Over the last couple of years, several more macro studies have been done talking about oil demand in a climate change-centric world and all have highlighted chemicals as one of the likely longer-term growth avenues for fossil fuels. We would expect ExxonMobil and other oil majors to look at investments in chemicals as a route to more captive consumption of hydrocarbons and believe that this could ultimately keep basic chemical and polymer markets oversupplied through the balance of this decade – we have been writing about this risk consistently since early 2020. ExxonMobil is already building ethylene capacity in the US in a JV with SABIC, but more oil company investments could come in the US. The caveat is that, as Dow covered in its MDI press release yesterday, any new investment is likely to need a carbon plan to get stakeholder and regulatory approval.