The exhibit below looks at the difference between a strong butadiene market in the US and a much weaker one in Asia. The strength in the US is a function of the stronger US economy and consumer spending as well as logistic issues with products containing butadiene derivatives, but also because there is no incentive to increase heavier cracker feedstock use right now in the US and consequently co-product butadiene supply remains constrained.
The commentary on oil reflects the opposing views that OPEC+ capacity is looming and that every piece of incremental negative demand news is frightening, versus that OPEC+ is disciplined and wants higher prices, resulting in every incremental positive being welcomed. We are firmly on the side of higher oil prices as we cannot see any stakeholder in oil wanting anything except opportunity profits for as long as it may last from here.
PVC margins are off their highs, as pricing is falling through June. The building product markets remain robust in our view, albeit off their highs, and some of the strength in PVC in April and May was a consequence of production shortages caused by the winter freeze in February. While PVC may be falling faster than polyethylene today, we see support for US PVC at higher prices and margins than for polyethylene in a weaker market unless oil climbs further relative to US ethane. See more on our daily report.
The weakness in polymer pricing in Asia and the drag that auto sales had on US consumer spending in May (spending was up ex-autos) should begin to undermine the very strong polypropylene market in the US, and the fall may happen at a reasonable clip. Polypropylene is more fungible than polyethylene, in that much more of the customization of polypropylene comes post-production rather than during production. There are several unique polyethylene technologies, especially for linear-low where the process drives the properties and adds value. For polypropylene, while there is some of this, most product is compounded and consequently, there is more fungibility before compounding and less risk from experimenting with suppliers. If freight rates were not so high as discussed in today's daily, we believe that we would have seen a notable amount of polypropylene moving from Asia to the US by now.
The ExxonMobil board headline linked has come up a couple of times since the Engine No.1 victory at the board meeting. There is no doubt that capital spending plans will be reviewed with the changes at the top, and we expect more management changes, which could also drive spending priorities. Over the last couple of years, several more macro studies have been done talking about oil demand in a climate change-centric world and all have highlighted chemicals as one of the likely longer-term growth avenues for fossil fuels. We would expect ExxonMobil and other oil majors to look at investments in chemicals as a route to more captive consumption of hydrocarbons and believe that this could ultimately keep basic chemical and polymer markets oversupplied through the balance of this decade – we have been writing about this risk consistently since early 2020. ExxonMobil is already building ethylene capacity in the US in a JV with SABIC, but more oil company investments could come in the US. The caveat is that, as Dow covered in its MDI press release yesterday, any new investment is likely to need a carbon plan to get stakeholder and regulatory approval.
The relative strength in US propane versus ethane is something we have talked about before, with the strong export pull on propane, pushing prices higher, despite equally strong demand for ethane in US ethylene units and for export. The projects to consume propane coming online in the next 12 months overwhelm the projects to consume ethane in our estimate and consequently, we believe that the delta (in chart below) will remain high and may widen further. On a cost basis, this could put US propylene and a distinct disadvantage to US ethylene and at the margin might help ethylene derivative demand relative to propylene derivative demand – most likely in paint additives, but also in some polymers where polypropylene can be substituted with other materials – it may provide a bit of a lifeline for polystyrene if the polystyrene recycling initiatives gain traction. See our daily report for more.
There is an interesting difference between the base chemicals markets and some of the other broad commodities and intermediates, and we have economic growth that is testing the capacity limits for many commodities and downstream products, but the overbuild in basic chemicals, most recently in China, is putting significant downward pressure on pricing, as we highlighted in yesterday’s Weekly Report. Capacity shortages in intermediates and some specialties, which are driving the investments we highlighted in today's daily report and which are a steady flow of news this year, are leading to some expanding margins over base chemicals in select areas where capacity has not kept pace with demand.
The Dow announcement yesterday speaks to a much larger issue within the investment community in our view, which is that research fees have come down so much over the last ten years that the sell-side gets paid very little for doing any real research. We talked about the upside in 2Q for the commodity polymer producers for months. Still, we know that we cannot get paid for maintaining the models needed to get to the numbers with enough confidence to publish estimates. The buy-side does not have the budget. In the past, as sell-side analysts, we would subscribe and talk to price discovery consultants, such as the predecessor companies of IHS (now in the middle of an acquisition by S&P) and CDI (in the middle of a merger with ICIS). This data and these dialogues would allow us to adjust earnings estimates during the quarter and keep up alongside our other work (e.g. corporate marketing/roadshows, etc.) as analysts. There is enough data in our weekly report – published each Monday to do this for many companies. (See an example in the chart below). Today, IHS has made its service so expensive that it is difficult for sell-side analysts to justify the cost when they are not getting paid by clients for real, fundamental research. The JP Morgan alleged base fee for research for an entire platform would not cover 25% of the IHS subscription cost for olefins and polyolefins data alone, per our estimate. Plus, all the merger activity at the data providers is causing some to question quality. The result is limited mid-quarter analysis from the sell-side and moves like Dow’s so that they can have realistic conversations with investors. In the case of Dow, it was to get the message out ahead of the Bernstein Conference.
While we continue to see valiant efforts from the polyethylene producers to increase prices further in June, this is what we used to refer to as a “cow in front of a train” strategy. In that throwing a cow in front of a train was not going to stop it, but it might slow it down a bit! Barring weather, it is inevitable that US polyethylene prices shown in the chart below will start to give back some of their premium pricing over the coming months. One factor among several others pointed out on today's Daily Report is that Ethylene is much weaker and the international markets are materially out of line, and if freight rates have peaked, the arbitrage will undermine prices in the US. Producers will do their best to hang on to the high margins for as long as they can, and a few more cows may be sacrificed, but the weather is their only hope.
The easing of US base chemical spot pricing continues and has now spread, as expected to polymer grade propylene. Supply now appears to be back to levels that do not reflect weather-related interruptions and despite the very strong downstream demand in the US the inevitable monomer surpluses are appearing. The US is a net importer of benzene and consequently, we see a floor being reached pretty quickly here, and while propylene prices could drop much further, PDH economics will provide support, and with a higher propane price, that support will likely be much higher than the price support for ethylene.