While Alpek shows a decline in the polypropylene to propylene spread in the exhibit below, it is important to note how high margins remain in the US. It is also important to note that the company points to high freight costs from Asia as one of the key drivers. China has significant polypropylene surpluses, and the price delta with the US is very high and, on paper, looks high enough to encourage imports into the US. But it is not that simple. The freight rates for containers from Asia are just one of many roadblocks, including wait time – on the water and the docks – and product quality. A US converter will likely not risk buying a few spot containers from China if focused on a product spec for a US customer. One way to get more material into the US would be for the end-user to buy the product – durable manufacturer or packager – and then ask its supplier to effectively toll-process. That way the product quality and logistic risk sit with the end consumer rather than the converter in the middle. The longer US domestic polypropylene prices remain inflated versus Asia, the more end-users may look at this option.
It is important to note from the chart below that the US plastic resin price index is out of phase with the overall industrial products markets as we saw a shortage driven peak in 2021 – largely weather and supply chain-related. The US on average continues to command resin price premiums relative to Asia. The China polymer surpluses are largely land-locked for now because of very high shipping costs and very high oil-based production costs, and the US surplus is also challenged because of logistic issues with exports. In the US, exporters are building inventory in anticipation of better logistics and on the basis that the surpluses for the most part have customers. If we do see a global slowdown in demand, triggered by inflation – see our most recent Sunday Recap – the inventories in the US and China could become a problem.
It's back to 2012/2013 for polyethylene, but with a potential twist. As we noted in today's daily report, international prices for polyethylene are being pushed up by oil prices, and even with higher prices in Asia, margins are still negative locally, which suggests that they will go higher. This margin umbrella is what generated windfall profits for US and Middle East producers in 2012, 2013, and half of 2014. The upward pressure remains high for international polyethylene prices because producers are not covering costs locally and in theory, the US should continue to benefit and we see domestic polyethylene prices rising again, both contract and spot. The risk for the US is local overcapacity of polyethylene and potential export challenges. The pricing arbitrage to export US polyethylene is huge and rising, but we are in a constrained trade world and we understand that export terminals are at capacity and warehouses are full. It is possible that the sharply lower US ethylene price is not just a function of new ethylene capacity, but also a function of integrated polyethylene producers choosing to limit production and looking for homes for the extra ethylene. If the polyethylene producers in the US try to push more volume domestically we could see local prices fall well below their export alternative – this is possible, but unlikely, in our view. Polypropylene does not have the same significant net export and the two plant closure in the US are likely enough to drive the price support that we are seeing this week.
As we have been suggesting for some time, there are pockets of real strength in chemicals; identifying them is the hard part. It is not enough to have pricing strength in a market where raw material prices are volatile daily and we have seen plenty of examples of companies with very strong end demand dynamics missing earnings because of a cost squeeze. We continue to highlight the competitive strength in the US in basic chemicals because of the decoupled and relatively low natural gas price and this is likely a large piece of the Dow earnings strength – strong polyethylene demand against a backdrop of relatively stable and lower costs. While polypropylene (Braskem) remains extremely profitable in the US, it has seen more sequential weakness than polyethylene – as we show in Exhibit 1 of today's daily report. That said, both polyethylene and polypropylene margins in the US are significantly higher than was likely expected this year and certainly what has been reflected in stock valuations, even with the commodity chemicals rally. Dow is also seeing the benefit of a very strong silicones market – something that was covered in detail in Wacker’s release earlier this month.
The upwards pressure on crude oil prices will likely drive propane prices much higher in the near term and this will significantly impact propane dehydrogenation (PDH) costs in the US and put further upward pressure on propylene prices and prices for propylene derivatives. Note in the exhibit below that US polymer prices are turning slightly more positive relative to Asia again. While some of this will be cost-based issues in the US, especially for polypropylene, higher freight rates (again) continue to make it difficult for producers in Asia to maintain attractive operating rates and make it harder to push prices higher to reflect what are now rapidly escalating costs. The oil moves today may result in more capacity closures in Asia, which should lead to better pricing, but as we noted in our Weekly on Monday (and likely more extreme today) outside of US ethane-based ethylene producers, no one is making money producing ethylene today. Prices are going higher.
The CP Chem propylene splitter announcement linked suggests that CP Chem expects surplus refinery propylene to be around for the long-term, and likely has supply lined up from the parent companies. However, this is still a bit of a gamble unless both parents see a scenario where they would change catalysts on FCC units longer-term and run at higher severity for more propylene and more hydrogen. This project looked a lot better only a few weeks ago than it does today – based on the spread in the Exhibit below, but propylene demand continues to grow faster than ethylene demand in the US and with all incremental ethylene capacity based on ethane, propylene consumers either have to choose the path from refineries or invest in on purpose PDH. PDH is an energy-intensive process with a large carbon footprint, and splitting refinery propylene likely looks far less problematic from an emissions perspective, especially if there is surplus process heat on-site. In our ESG report today we talk about polymer recycling into new end markets, but polypropylene may see more direct substitution, especially if we see consumables related polypropylene recycled into durable polypropylene markets. This might dent demand growth for polypropylene going forward, but probably not meaningfully.
Following on from the LyondellBasell commentary in today's daily report, we would make one further, but very important point. With its refinery (granted the company is exploring opportunities to exit) and its huge commodity polyethylene, polypropylene, and propylene oxide business, any attempt to pursue a “specialty” strategy that encompasses the whole portfolio will be seen (crudely) as trying to put some lipstick on a pig! This rarely works in the chemical sector and the real transformation stories involve wholesale portfolio shifts, many of which have taken notable periods of time to develop. We still believe that the right path for LyondellBasell is to spin off the good piece – recycling, licensing, and compounding, or even better, find someone they can sell the business to through a Reverse Morris Trust. This strategy would likely allow the company to pay down (or shift) a significant amount of debt. The commodity business can then focus on the best strategy for a commodity polymer business in the face of energy transition, which might involve taking the business private or merging with another.
The ACC forecasts below leave us a little confused as the implication for specialty chemicals is that production declines in the US by an average of 2.0% per annum from 2019 to 2023. Given the demand that we are seeing for US manufacturing, as covered in our most recent Sunday Report, we would expect demand for all inputs to rise and it is unlikely that the gap would be filled by a swing in net imports. The lower demand from the Auto industry in 2020 and 2021 and broader manufacturing shutdowns in 2020 explains the 2020 and 2021 numbers to a degree, but it is not clear why there would not be a rebound as auto rates increase. We would also expect to see a stronger rebound in polymer production in 2022, assuming weather events are less impactful than in 2021, given substantial new capacity for polyethylene from ExxonMobil/SABIC, BayStar, and Shell.
The polypropylene chart below, shows just how much of an impact the polymer has on the “average” in Exhibit 1 from today's daily report. Polypropylene is the only large volume polymer that can afford the freight rates to move surpluses from Asia to the US today and while some material is moving, volumes remain limited by the high cost of shipping and some of the additional logistic hurdles getting truck-based materials to US consumers that generally take the product by rail. The very high polypropylene margin in the US is a function not only of very strong demand but also demand that is likely growing faster than expected, giving buyers little negotiating room to get materially lower pricing. A year-end inventory correction from polymer buyers might send prices lower more quickly, but we have yet to see much evidence. We remain surprised by the apparent demand for polypropylene in the US given the lower automotive throughputs in 2021.
US rail data for chemicals remain at the 5-year highs and have been there for almost 2 months. This is working its way into the supply chain and we are seeing weakness in US polymer prices across the board, except for PVC. US spot polymer prices are in a bit of a “no man's land” right now as they would need to drop significantly to find incremental demand offshore, given US premiums to the rest of the world. We believe that most of the volume leaving the US is doing so within company-specific businesses – ExxonMobil supplying ExxonMobil customers, Dow supplying Dow customers, etc, and consequently, these shipments do not show up in the spot market.