Following on again with our inflation theme, which features heavily in today's Daily Report, note that RPM’s release is riddled with references to inflation impacting results negatively as raw material and logistic costs increased. The commodity chemical and polymer producers have much more pricing flexibility than the specialty makers like RPM, and they can generally pass through higher costs quite quickly. For the specialty companies, there is generally a lag, as is clearly shown in RPM’s results, but they generally catch up with pricing as long as demand is robust, which it appears to be. The benefit for the specialty companies is that they can often hold on to price increases or at least some of the increase longer than a commodity producer can as raw materials and fundamentals ease. We expect the intermediate and specialty chemical producers in the US and Europe to have strong demand growth in 2022, as the reshoring momentum should continue and offset any risk of weaker consumer spending on durables as the year progresses. We have been more focused on companies that are selling materials into construction and renewable energy and EV markets, but RPM has enough exposure that it should also be a beneficiary as long as prices can keep pace with costs.
The linked headline is interesting and accurate, but the “civilian” education around plastics has just begun – and will need to be continuing education. Plus, the agenda for plastics producers likely changed with COP26. On the first point, while consumers have been made more aware of plastic waste issues and recycling in 2021, it is still very mixed by geography, with some countries and some US states making major pushes in 2021 while others have lagged. There remains a significant level of skepticism and disinterest in recycling in the US as we discussed in a recent ESG and Climate report – linked here (See chart below). The continuing education comment is based on the likely significant evolution of plastics over the next ten years. If we introduce more biodegradable polymers into the mix, these will have to be dealt with differently by consumers. Also, as packagers move towards more “recyclable” packaging, more materials will move from a waste stream to a chemically recyclable stream and ultimately to a mechanically recyclable stream – as this evolves, consumers will need constant updates is they are expected to play a part.
We have seen relative stability in US spot ethylene and propylene prices for several weeks now, despite some volatility in feedstock markets. Ethylene likely has significant export support in that there are complexes in Asia that are net short of ethylene and where derivative production can be increased if ethylene is available at the right price. There are also displacement opportunities if US ethylene can be delivered to importers in Asia at lower prices than local production costs. This is broadly the case today and there may even be select opportunities in Europe. In Asia it is likely easier, as the buyer would be replacing an alternate supplier. In Europe, most potential buyers would be looking at cutting back their own local production and that is a more marginal decision given the impact on unit economics of lower operating rates. US propylene demand remains high, but prices are now settling closer to PDH costs, although not close enough to encourage anyone to slow production. See more in today's daily report!
Following on from the Enterprise comments covered in our daily report, the company is more likely to acquire something in chemicals than build it in our view, especially if a move into ethylene or polymers is on the table. Today, building capacity will come with all sorts of emission-related restrictions most likely, and many of the new build announcements we have seen since COP26 have come with a carbon plan (Dow, Air Product, and Borouge). While it is not obvious today that any Gulf Coast ethylene capacity is up for sale, we would imagine that most companies are reviewing strategy and evaluating whether they have assets of entire businesses that may have a better owner. This would be especially true if a basic chemical business is holding back the valuation of a more interesting core. In the recent past, we have talked about the relative value arbitrage open to LyondellBasell from separating its compounding, licensing, and recycling business from the core. Maybe the core would fit well with Enterprise? As the chart below shows, there is money in buying ethylene for export, but there is more money in the US in making ethylene, as discussed in our daily report.
We have been asked a couple of times in the last week how US polymer (polyethylene in particular) pricing can remain so robust in a market where there is an inventory build going on. The PMI numbers are part of the answer. While we may be in the seasonally weaker part of the year, customers are still looking for more material than a year ago, and this makes the “we need a lower price” argument much harder, especially when the memory of 1H 2021 acute shortages is still fresh in the memory and when, more than likely, they are getting signals from their customers of a further step up in demand in 2022. We have done some traveling recently and the incremental demand for packaging polymers is very evident in the travel and leisure business, even if the number of travelers is still down. There is more packaging on airline and airport food and hotels are offering pre-packaged food for breakfast that would previously have not been individually packed. The reasons are obvious – safety and hygiene from the consumers' end and costs from the providers' end, as prepackaged food, can be bought in bulk and more cost-effectively and they likely have a longer shelf life.
The CP Chem propylene splitter announcement linked suggests that CP Chem expects surplus refinery propylene to be around for the long-term, and likely has supply lined up from the parent companies. However, this is still a bit of a gamble unless both parents see a scenario where they would change catalysts on FCC units longer-term and run at higher severity for more propylene and more hydrogen. This project looked a lot better only a few weeks ago than it does today – based on the spread in the Exhibit below, but propylene demand continues to grow faster than ethylene demand in the US and with all incremental ethylene capacity based on ethane, propylene consumers either have to choose the path from refineries or invest in on purpose PDH. PDH is an energy-intensive process with a large carbon footprint, and splitting refinery propylene likely looks far less problematic from an emissions perspective, especially if there is surplus process heat on-site. In our ESG report today we talk about polymer recycling into new end markets, but polypropylene may see more direct substitution, especially if we see consumables related polypropylene recycled into durable polypropylene markets. This might dent demand growth for polypropylene going forward, but probably not meaningfully.
Following on from the LyondellBasell commentary in today's daily report, we would make one further, but very important point. With its refinery (granted the company is exploring opportunities to exit) and its huge commodity polyethylene, polypropylene, and propylene oxide business, any attempt to pursue a “specialty” strategy that encompasses the whole portfolio will be seen (crudely) as trying to put some lipstick on a pig! This rarely works in the chemical sector and the real transformation stories involve wholesale portfolio shifts, many of which have taken notable periods of time to develop. We still believe that the right path for LyondellBasell is to spin off the good piece – recycling, licensing, and compounding, or even better, find someone they can sell the business to through a Reverse Morris Trust. This strategy would likely allow the company to pay down (or shift) a significant amount of debt. The commodity business can then focus on the best strategy for a commodity polymer business in the face of energy transition, which might involve taking the business private or merging with another.
The theme of our Sunday report (to be found here) will be inflation this week and the signs that we are seeing across multiple industries which suggest it could be more problematic and worsen in 2022. One of the focuses is energy and how the pressures to be seen as good citizens is lowering investment in oil and natural gas production, while the world is not far enough advanced on energy transition to be able to substitute for the missing hydrocarbons. We would agree with many of the recent comments from some segments of congress, which is that the answer is not to curtail exports of LNG and crude, as by doing so we will starve the rest of the world of hydrocarbons and create worse shortages than Europe and China are seeing today. The better solution would be to support “clean” US production of the lowest emission fuels possible – especially for natural gas. As we have noted in prior research, with a global solutions hat on, the relatively low costs of natural gas F&D costs in the US, when combined with what we expect to be relatively low costs of emission abatement in the US, should drive more investment in the US, creating jobs and export income.
The ACC forecasts below leave us a little confused as the implication for specialty chemicals is that production declines in the US by an average of 2.0% per annum from 2019 to 2023. Given the demand that we are seeing for US manufacturing, as covered in our most recent Sunday Report, we would expect demand for all inputs to rise and it is unlikely that the gap would be filled by a swing in net imports. The lower demand from the Auto industry in 2020 and 2021 and broader manufacturing shutdowns in 2020 explains the 2020 and 2021 numbers to a degree, but it is not clear why there would not be a rebound as auto rates increase. We would also expect to see a stronger rebound in polymer production in 2022, assuming weather events are less impactful than in 2021, given substantial new capacity for polyethylene from ExxonMobil/SABIC, BayStar, and Shell.
The polypropylene chart below, shows just how much of an impact the polymer has on the “average” in Exhibit 1 from today's daily report. Polypropylene is the only large volume polymer that can afford the freight rates to move surpluses from Asia to the US today and while some material is moving, volumes remain limited by the high cost of shipping and some of the additional logistic hurdles getting truck-based materials to US consumers that generally take the product by rail. The very high polypropylene margin in the US is a function not only of very strong demand but also demand that is likely growing faster than expected, giving buyers little negotiating room to get materially lower pricing. A year-end inventory correction from polymer buyers might send prices lower more quickly, but we have yet to see much evidence. We remain surprised by the apparent demand for polypropylene in the US given the lower automotive throughputs in 2021.